Jump to content

Consumer Action Taskforce talk:Moderator guidelines

From Consumer_Action_Taskforce
Revision as of 11:14, 20 January 2025 by Martinligabue (talk | contribs)

Just a few typos

    • Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable <-notable
  1. The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article
    • The level of managerial independance <- independence
    • The level of managerial independance - how independant <- independent
  • Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu <-

lead to deletion if it's in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch <-

Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision <- decision

  • Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh <- through
  • If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful <-
  • The article should be neutral and factual, without unneccesarily -< unnecessarily

A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization

    • Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon's delivery authorization <- authorisation?
    • Remove aricle, <-

A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised?

-- Preceding unsigned comment by DavidBenJr at 04:21, 15 January 2025‎