Deep Cycle Systems

⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete

This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. In particular:

1. There are several comments pointing out spots that need some improvement.
2. Other than those this article may need some rework to fit the company page template

This notice will be removed once the issue/s highlighted above have been addressed and sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Learn more ▼

This Article Requires Additional Verification

---

This article has been flagged due to verification concerns. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the Moderator Guidelines and Mission statement; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!

Why This Article Is In Question

---

Articles in this wiki are required to:

• Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
• Avoid relying on anecdotal, unsourced, or suspicious citations that lack legitimacy.
• Make sure that all claims are backed by reliable documentation or reporting from reputable sources.

Examples of issues that trigger this notice:

• A topic that heavily relies on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources.
• Unsupported claims with no evidence or citations to back them up.
• Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.

How You Can Improve This Article

---

To address verification concerns:

• Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
• Make sure that claims are backed by reputable reporting or independent documentation.
• Provide additional evidence to demonstrate systemic relevance and factual accuracy. For example:
  • Avoid: Claims based entirely on personal anecdotes or hearsay without supporting documentation.
  • Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.

If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join here.

This article is about the battery manufacturer. For other uses, see DCS (disambiguation).

Deep Cycle Systems

Basic information
Founded	2015
Type	Private
Industry	Lithium Batteries
Official website	https://deepcyclesystems.com.au/

Deep Cycle Systems (DCS), founded in 2015, is an Australian company that specializes in the design and manufacture of lithium batteries and energy storage solutions.

Claims

DCS claims to manufacture long-life lithium batteries for extreme climates. They advertise them for use in solar systems and hybrid vehicles, including marine ones such as boats.^{[citation needed]}

Incidents

Lawsuit against reviews

Main article:DCS sues Small YouTuber for accurate product review showing battery issues & misleading warranty

On August 16, 2023, Australian YouTuber AlloffroadAu uploaded a review on DCS' 12v 50ah LiFePo4 lithium battery, mentioning the short longevity and substantial decline in performance after preforming a capacity test. They also made a followup video regarding DCS' questionable history. Both videos were set to private following legal threats from DCS.^{[citation needed]}

AlloffroadAu reports that 30–50% of the storage capacity is lost in the first several years.^{[citation needed]}They also point out that DCS states that battery capacity will be significantly reduced after traveling a certain distance, but that they also don't mention this in their warranty policy.

Hidden warranty policy update

DCS' warranty policy claims that:

• For 'normal installations', batteries that fail to deliver 80% of its rated capacity are covered.
• For installations in engine bays/compartments, batteries that fail to deliver 70% of its rated capacity are covered.
• This policy was last updated June 14, 2021.

This has been the case since November 7, 2023 according to Trove, a web archiving service ran by the National Library of Australia. However, Trove shows that on March 9, 2023, the exception for installations in engine bays/compartments didn't exist, contradicting DCS's statement that their policy was last updated in 2021.

The lack of the second criterion means that owners of a DCS battery purchased before March 9 2023 that:

• Was installed in an engine bay/compartment.
• Fell below 80% of its rated capacity.
• Remained above 70% of it.

would be eligible for warranty coverage, but would have no way of knowing because of the changes to DCS' public warranty policy.

The Trove archives can be found here:

• DCS Warranty Policy on November 7 2023
• DCS Warranty Policy on March 9 2023

Alleged removal of Wayback Machine archives

Internet Archive's Wayback Machine has archives of this policy page, but they are all dated in 2024. This is suspicious when considering:

• DCS falsely claims that their policy was last updated in 2021, when Trove's archives show it was actually updated in 2023, both years not being covered by the Wayback Machine.
• Louis Rossmann claims that consumers of DCS batteries have reached out to him, claiming that they were no longer able to access many older archives of the policy page when they contacted DCS asking when their policy was updated.

This would suggest that DCS was behind the removal of archives before 2024.

Suspected fake positive reviews

DCS has been suspected of fabricating positive reviews.^{[citation needed]}

Safety issues

A reviewer claimed that on August 4 2023 his car, carrying DCS batteries exploded and caught on fire, the occupants were unharmed but the car was destroyed as a result of the incident. The reviewer alleged that he was faced with legal threats from DCS for publishing the initial review.