Pinterest: Difference between revisions
Page started |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Type =Public | | Type =Public | ||
| Founded =2009 | | Founded =2009 | ||
| Industry =Social media | | Industry =Social media service | ||
| Official Website =pinterest.com | | Official Website =https://pinterest.com/ | ||
| Logo =Pinterest | | Logo =Pinterest.svg | ||
}}Pinterest is a photo hosting service and company started by Ben Silbermann, Paul Sciarra, and Evan Sharp in December 2009. It was initially intended to function as a digital version of traditional catalogs, however it transitioned to being an image host shortly after.<ref>https://www.fastcompany.com/3001984/pinterest-pivot</ref> | }}'''[[wikipedia:Pinterest|Pinterest]]''' is a photo hosting service and company started by Ben Silbermann, Paul Sciarra, and Evan Sharp in December 2009. It was initially intended to function as a digital version of traditional catalogs, however it transitioned to being an image host shortly after.<ref>https://www.fastcompany.com/3001984/pinterest-pivot</ref> | ||
==Consumer impact summary== | ==Consumer impact summary== | ||
* '''User freedom''': Absolute; content is rarely taken down unless mass-reported. | |||
* '''User privacy''': Questionable; private boards can be accessed by staff. | |||
* '''Business model''': Profits off of affiliate links and advertisements. | |||
* '''Market control''': Dominant; overrides original sources in image searches.<ref name=":0">http://www.dailydot.com/business/print-erest-printerest-pinterest-response/</ref><ref name=":1">https://discover.hubpages.com/technology/Is-Pinterest-a-Haven-for-Copyright-Violations<!-- Note: Source published first in 2012, earliest mention of licensing of pinned content in comments is 2013, and last edit was 2016. --> | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]]. | This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]]. | ||
=== Training of AI based on user-submitted content (2025) === | ===Training of AI based on user-submitted content (2025)=== | ||
Further Reading: [[Nonconsensual scraping]] | Further Reading: [[Nonconsensual scraping]] | ||
In March of 2025, Pinterest updated their TOS<ref name=":2">https://policy.pinterest.com/en/privacy-policy-preview</ref> to include a new clause which states<blockquote>Improve the products and services of our family of companies and offer new features. For example, using information to train, develop and improve our technology such as our machine learning models, regardless of when Pins were posted. This includes, for example, Pinterest’s body type technology, which is trained on images in Pins posted to our Services.</blockquote>The vagueness of this new clause rightfully brings concern,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Harrison |first=Maggie |date=Mar 8, 2025 |title=Pinterest Changes User Terms So It Can Train AI on User Data and Photos, Regardless of When They Were Posted |url=https://futurism.com/pinterest-data-photos-train-ai |access-date=Mar 10, 2025 |work=Futurism}}</ref> as Pinterest has been well-known to host stolen content.<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/vuns1z/people_are_stealing_my_photos_what_can_i_do/</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/183gceg/help_how_do_i_report_stolen_pins/</ref><ref>https://brandingforsmes.com/dealing-with-stolen-pinterest-pins-or-blog-content-a-guide-for-content-creators/</ref> This | In March of 2025, Pinterest updated their TOS<ref name=":2">https://policy.pinterest.com/en/privacy-policy-preview</ref> to include a new clause which states:<blockquote>Improve the products and services of our family of companies and offer new features. For example, using information to train, develop and improve our technology such as our machine learning models, regardless of when Pins were posted. This includes, for example, Pinterest’s body type technology, which is trained on images in Pins posted to our Services.</blockquote>The vagueness of this new clause rightfully brings concern,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Harrison |first=Maggie |date=Mar 8, 2025 |title=Pinterest Changes User Terms So It Can Train AI on User Data and Photos, Regardless of When They Were Posted |url=https://futurism.com/pinterest-data-photos-train-ai |access-date=Mar 10, 2025 |work=Futurism}}</ref> as Pinterest has been well-known to host stolen content.<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/vuns1z/people_are_stealing_my_photos_what_can_i_do/</ref><ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/183gceg/help_how_do_i_report_stolen_pins/</ref><ref>https://brandingforsmes.com/dealing-with-stolen-pinterest-pins-or-blog-content-a-guide-for-content-creators/</ref> This suggests that user-generated works may have been collected and used for AI training purposes without explicit consent. Such data could be utilized to train Pinterest's own AI models or sold as training data to other companies developing AI technologies. | ||
=== Exploitation of pinned images (circa 2012) === | ===Exploitation of pinned images (circa 2012)=== | ||
As content from creators are nonconsensually "pinned" to the platform, since 2012,<ref name=":1" /> if not earlier, Pinterest claims rights inside its TOS<ref name=":2" /><ref>Kalliopi Monoyios (March 19, 2012). "[http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Pinterest's Terms of Service, Word by Terrifying Word]". ''Scientific American''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20120523164313/http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Archived] from the original on May 23, 2012. Retrieved March 10, 2025.</ref> to<blockquote>By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, *modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.</blockquote>In | As content from creators are nonconsensually "pinned" to the platform, since 2012,<ref name=":1" /> if not earlier, Pinterest claims rights inside its TOS<ref name=":2" /><ref>Kalliopi Monoyios (March 19, 2012). "[http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Pinterest's Terms of Service, Word by Terrifying Word]". ''Scientific American''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20120523164313/http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Archived] from the original on May 23, 2012. Retrieved March 10, 2025.</ref> to:<blockquote>By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, *modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.</blockquote>In simpler terms, this means that any content uploaded to Pinterest can be freely utilized by the platform and its users in any manner. Given the platform's history of hosting content without explicit consent, this raises concerns that creators' works may be overridden in search feeds<ref name=":0" /> and copyrights overridden for unauthorized purposes by other publishers.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
[[DeviantArt]] | |||
* [[DeviantArt]] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 34: | ||
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]] | [[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]] | ||
[[Category:Pinterest]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:51, 13 March 2025
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
Notice: This Article Requires Additional Expansion
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Issues may include:
- This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
- This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
- More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
- The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
- The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content
How You Can Help:
- Add documented examples with verifiable sources
- Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
- Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
- Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
- Flesh out the article with relevant information
This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.
Pinterest
| Basic information | |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 |
| Type | Public |
| Industry | Social media service |
| Official website | https://pinterest.com/ |
Pinterest is a photo hosting service and company started by Ben Silbermann, Paul Sciarra, and Evan Sharp in December 2009. It was initially intended to function as a digital version of traditional catalogs, however it transitioned to being an image host shortly after.[1]
Consumer impact summary[edit | edit source]
- User freedom: Absolute; content is rarely taken down unless mass-reported.
- User privacy: Questionable; private boards can be accessed by staff.
- Business model: Profits off of affiliate links and advertisements.
- Market control: Dominant; overrides original sources in image searches.[2][3]
Incidents[edit | edit source]
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the Pinterest category.
Training of AI based on user-submitted content (2025)[edit | edit source]
Further Reading: Nonconsensual scraping
In March of 2025, Pinterest updated their TOS[4] to include a new clause which states:
Improve the products and services of our family of companies and offer new features. For example, using information to train, develop and improve our technology such as our machine learning models, regardless of when Pins were posted. This includes, for example, Pinterest’s body type technology, which is trained on images in Pins posted to our Services.
The vagueness of this new clause rightfully brings concern,[5] as Pinterest has been well-known to host stolen content.[6][7][8] This suggests that user-generated works may have been collected and used for AI training purposes without explicit consent. Such data could be utilized to train Pinterest's own AI models or sold as training data to other companies developing AI technologies.
Exploitation of pinned images (circa 2012)[edit | edit source]
As content from creators are nonconsensually "pinned" to the platform, since 2012,[3] if not earlier, Pinterest claims rights inside its TOS[4][9] to:
By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, *modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.
In simpler terms, this means that any content uploaded to Pinterest can be freely utilized by the platform and its users in any manner. Given the platform's history of hosting content without explicit consent, this raises concerns that creators' works may be overridden in search feeds[2] and copyrights overridden for unauthorized purposes by other publishers.[2]
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ https://www.fastcompany.com/3001984/pinterest-pivot
- ↑ Jump up to: 2.0 2.1 2.2 http://www.dailydot.com/business/print-erest-printerest-pinterest-response/
- ↑ Jump up to: 3.0 3.1 https://discover.hubpages.com/technology/Is-Pinterest-a-Haven-for-Copyright-Violations
- ↑ Jump up to: 4.0 4.1 https://policy.pinterest.com/en/privacy-policy-preview
- ↑ Harrison, Maggie (Mar 8, 2025). "Pinterest Changes User Terms So It Can Train AI on User Data and Photos, Regardless of When They Were Posted". Futurism. Retrieved Mar 10, 2025.
- ↑ https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/vuns1z/people_are_stealing_my_photos_what_can_i_do/
- ↑ https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/183gceg/help_how_do_i_report_stolen_pins/
- ↑ https://brandingforsmes.com/dealing-with-stolen-pinterest-pins-or-blog-content-a-guide-for-content-creators/
- ↑ Kalliopi Monoyios (March 19, 2012). "Pinterest's Terms of Service, Word by Terrifying Word". Scientific American. Archived from the original on May 23, 2012. Retrieved March 10, 2025.