Interactive Brokers: Difference between revisions
category |
mNo edit summary |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Incomplete}} | |||
{{InfoboxCompany | |||
| Name = Interactive Brokers | |||
| Type = Public | |||
| Founded = 1978 | |||
| Industry = Financial | |||
| Official Website = https://interactivebrokers.com | |||
| Logo = Interactive Brokers.png | |||
}} | |||
'''[[Wikipedia:Interactive Brokers|Interactive Brokers, Inc.]]''' (IB) is an American multinational firm that provides brokerage and financial services. The company operates under various names and legal structures across different jurisdictions, such as '''Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited''', and specializes in distinct lines of business, including '''Interactive Brokers, LLC''' for futures markets. | |||
IB connects its customers to a wide range of financial markets, including futures markets based in the United States. | |||
==Select business and consumer practices== | |||
===Arbitration agreements=== | |||
IB customers can request trading permissions to access futures markets based in the United States. The process for obtaining these permissions can be completed through IB's public-facing customer portal. Customers must log in, navigate to the appropriate settings, review the provided documentation, and complete a web form to electronically 'sign' the agreement. When selecting futures trading permissions, customers will encounter a '''Futures Arbitration Agreement''' among the documents they are required to acknowledge. | |||
The agreement may include text such as:<blockquote>You need not sign this agreement to open or maintain an account with IB. See 17 CFR 166.5</blockquote>Note that as of 2015-01-15, the text of 17 CFR 166.5 includes paragraph (c)(1):<ref>https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-17/chapter-I/part-166/section-166.5</ref><blockquote>Signing the agreement must not be made a condition for the customer to utilize the services offered by the Commission registrant.</blockquote>and portions of paragraph (c)(2):<blockquote>If the agreement is contained as a clause or clauses of a broader agreement, the customer must separately endorse the clause or clauses containing the cautionary language and provisions specified in this section.</blockquote>However, IB's online trading-permission web form does not allow customers to separately endorse the 'cautionary language and provisions' from the 'settlement procedure' (e.g., the Futures Arbitration Agreement). | |||
As a result, applicable IB customers may not realize that they can open futures transactions without agreeing to the Futures Arbitration Agreement. They may also be unaware that IB's systems impose a 1-contract trading restriction on accounts that do not agree to the agreement. Furthermore, customers may not recognize that this behavior by IB's systems conflicts with 17 CFR 166.5(c)(1), which they might have believed would protect them from such restrictions. | |||
=== | ===Interest rates charged=== | ||
IB may be charging customers interest rates that exceed the maximum allowable rates set by statutory laws in certain U.S. jurisdictions. For example, the 2024 Maryland Code, Commercial Law § 12-102, specifies a maximum interest rate of 6% per annum.<ref>https://law.justia.com/codes/maryland/commercial-law/title-12/subtitle-1/section-12-102/</ref> However, IB does not explicitly state that it limits its interest rates to 6% for customers residing in Maryland. | |||
It is | It is worth noting that other brokerage firms publicly advertise significantly higher (and less favorable) interest rates to their customers, which may provide context for IB's practices. Nonetheless, the lack of clarity regarding compliance with state-specific interest rate laws raises questions about transparency and adherence to legal requirements.<ref>https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/index.php?f=44427</ref> | ||
=== | ==Public sphere== | ||
===Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) action=== | |||
On September 28, 2021, the U.S. [[Commodity Futures Trading Commission]] (CFTC) issued a press release announcing that it had settled charges against Interactive Brokers, LLC. The settlement included a $1.75 million fine and $82.57 million in customer restitution for the following violation:<ref>https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8432-21</ref><blockquote>Failing to diligently supervise the handling of its customer accounts by not adequately preparing and configuring its electronic trading system to receive negative prices and calculate margin on April 20, 2020, in violation of CFTC Regulation 166.3.</blockquote>On April 20, 2020, the May 2020 West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contract, traded on the NYMEX exchange, settled at negative prices. The CFTC alleges that when a futures commission merchant, such as Interactive Brokers, LLC, operates systems incapable of accurately reflecting actual market prices, customers may suffer harm. | |||
It remains unclear whether the CFTC or any other regulator has required Interactive Brokers, LLC, to update its systems to a specific performance standard to prevent customers from being exposed to potential harm from similar incidents in the future. | |||
https:// | ===January 2021 customer trading restrictions=== | ||
On January 28, 2021, Interactive Brokers restricted customer trading in certain securities with heightened stock volatility, including GameStop, AMC Entertainment, and Koss. Specifically, the company prevented customers from opening new options positions.<ref>https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/interactive-brokers-restricted-gamestop-trading-to-protect-the-market-says-chairman-peterffy.html</ref> Interactive Brokers' chairman, Thomas Peterffy, stated in an interview with CNBC that the decision was made independently by the company and not due to external pressure, including from parties who might have financially benefited from disrupted order flow. CNBC also noted that the brokerage [[Robinhood]] had imposed similar trading restrictions on the same day.<ref>https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/robinhood-interactive-brokers-restrict-trading-in-gamestop-s.html</ref> | |||
Customers should be aware that brokers, including IB, may take similar actions in the future. This poses a risk of economic harm, as investors could be artificially prevented from entering or executing trades during critical market movements. | |||
==References== | |||
<references /> | |||
[[Category:Interactive Brokers]] | |||
[[Category: |
Latest revision as of 20:36, 4 March 2025
⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete
This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.
This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the #appeals
channel.
Learn more ▼
Basic information | |
---|---|
Founded | 1978 |
Type | Public |
Industry | Financial |
Official website | https://interactivebrokers.com |
Interactive Brokers, Inc. (IB) is an American multinational firm that provides brokerage and financial services. The company operates under various names and legal structures across different jurisdictions, such as Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Limited, and specializes in distinct lines of business, including Interactive Brokers, LLC for futures markets.
IB connects its customers to a wide range of financial markets, including futures markets based in the United States.
Select business and consumer practices[edit | edit source]
Arbitration agreements[edit | edit source]
IB customers can request trading permissions to access futures markets based in the United States. The process for obtaining these permissions can be completed through IB's public-facing customer portal. Customers must log in, navigate to the appropriate settings, review the provided documentation, and complete a web form to electronically 'sign' the agreement. When selecting futures trading permissions, customers will encounter a Futures Arbitration Agreement among the documents they are required to acknowledge.
The agreement may include text such as:
You need not sign this agreement to open or maintain an account with IB. See 17 CFR 166.5
Note that as of 2015-01-15, the text of 17 CFR 166.5 includes paragraph (c)(1):[1]
Signing the agreement must not be made a condition for the customer to utilize the services offered by the Commission registrant.
and portions of paragraph (c)(2):
If the agreement is contained as a clause or clauses of a broader agreement, the customer must separately endorse the clause or clauses containing the cautionary language and provisions specified in this section.
However, IB's online trading-permission web form does not allow customers to separately endorse the 'cautionary language and provisions' from the 'settlement procedure' (e.g., the Futures Arbitration Agreement).
As a result, applicable IB customers may not realize that they can open futures transactions without agreeing to the Futures Arbitration Agreement. They may also be unaware that IB's systems impose a 1-contract trading restriction on accounts that do not agree to the agreement. Furthermore, customers may not recognize that this behavior by IB's systems conflicts with 17 CFR 166.5(c)(1), which they might have believed would protect them from such restrictions.
Interest rates charged[edit | edit source]
IB may be charging customers interest rates that exceed the maximum allowable rates set by statutory laws in certain U.S. jurisdictions. For example, the 2024 Maryland Code, Commercial Law § 12-102, specifies a maximum interest rate of 6% per annum.[2] However, IB does not explicitly state that it limits its interest rates to 6% for customers residing in Maryland.
It is worth noting that other brokerage firms publicly advertise significantly higher (and less favorable) interest rates to their customers, which may provide context for IB's practices. Nonetheless, the lack of clarity regarding compliance with state-specific interest rate laws raises questions about transparency and adherence to legal requirements.[3]
Public sphere[edit | edit source]
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) action[edit | edit source]
On September 28, 2021, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a press release announcing that it had settled charges against Interactive Brokers, LLC. The settlement included a $1.75 million fine and $82.57 million in customer restitution for the following violation:[4]
Failing to diligently supervise the handling of its customer accounts by not adequately preparing and configuring its electronic trading system to receive negative prices and calculate margin on April 20, 2020, in violation of CFTC Regulation 166.3.
On April 20, 2020, the May 2020 West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contract, traded on the NYMEX exchange, settled at negative prices. The CFTC alleges that when a futures commission merchant, such as Interactive Brokers, LLC, operates systems incapable of accurately reflecting actual market prices, customers may suffer harm.
It remains unclear whether the CFTC or any other regulator has required Interactive Brokers, LLC, to update its systems to a specific performance standard to prevent customers from being exposed to potential harm from similar incidents in the future.
January 2021 customer trading restrictions[edit | edit source]
On January 28, 2021, Interactive Brokers restricted customer trading in certain securities with heightened stock volatility, including GameStop, AMC Entertainment, and Koss. Specifically, the company prevented customers from opening new options positions.[5] Interactive Brokers' chairman, Thomas Peterffy, stated in an interview with CNBC that the decision was made independently by the company and not due to external pressure, including from parties who might have financially benefited from disrupted order flow. CNBC also noted that the brokerage Robinhood had imposed similar trading restrictions on the same day.[6]
Customers should be aware that brokers, including IB, may take similar actions in the future. This poses a risk of economic harm, as investors could be artificially prevented from entering or executing trades during critical market movements.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-17/chapter-I/part-166/section-166.5
- ↑ https://law.justia.com/codes/maryland/commercial-law/title-12/subtitle-1/section-12-102/
- ↑ https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/index.php?f=44427
- ↑ https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8432-21
- ↑ https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/interactive-brokers-restricted-gamestop-trading-to-protect-the-market-says-chairman-peterffy.html
- ↑ https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/robinhood-interactive-brokers-restrict-trading-in-gamestop-s.html