Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Categories
Random page
Top Contributors
Recent changes
Contribute
Create a page
How to help
Wiki policy
Adapt videos to articles
Articles in need of work
Help
Frequently asked questions
Join the discord!
Help about MediaWiki
Consumer_Action_Taskforce
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Paragon NTFS software license invalidation
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Purge cache
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Revocation of previously purchased software=== This incident represents a clear example of a company redefining what "ownership" means after a customer buys the product. By creating a technical barrier (new licensing system) that prevents users from using software they legitimately purchased, Paragon converted perpetual licenses into limited-time licenses that became unusable after system changes, with no warning at the time of purchase as to when the license would stop working. This practice aligns with several modern consumer exploitation tactics outlined in our [[Mission statement]]: *Changing a purchased item into a significantly different version after the sale (by making the license unusable). *Redefining "purchase" and "ownership" after the fact—turning a product advertised as a "perpetual license" into a time-limited, revocable service. *Creating a technical barrier that renders previously functional products unusable. Customers followed the correct procedure by: *Purchasing the software legitimately. *Maintaining their account information. *Following all troubleshooting steps provided by Paragon. *Contacting customer service through official channels. *Attempting to use the license revocation process as directed. Despite this, customers are effectively told their purchase is no longer valid and they would need to pay again. Customers who bought Paragon software legally are forced to either: *Repurchase software they already owned. *Lose access to functionality they had paid for. *Seek alternative solutions, potentially less reliable or feature-complete.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumer_Action_Taskforce are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (see
Consumer Action Taskforce:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Category:Pages using the JsonConfig extension