Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here
Consumer Action Taskforce talk:Article types: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 21 January by Fephisto
Created page with "=== Question === I would like to just start cataloguing EULAs that violate "consideration." In other words "after-purchase EULAs" or a list of products that make you agree to a contract ''after'' you've already bought the product. That way if someone's thinking of buying something, they can use this wiki to go to that list, and then click on that link to get to the license agreement to see what exactly they're even agreeing to before they buy it. Is that allowed? If so,..." |
m Keith moved page Consumer Action Taskforce talk:Article Types to Consumer Action Taskforce talk:Article types: Misspelled title: Not in sentence case |
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 19:45, 26 January 2025
Question[edit source]
I would like to just start cataloguing EULAs that violate "consideration." In other words "after-purchase EULAs" or a list of products that make you agree to a contract after you've already bought the product. That way if someone's thinking of buying something, they can use this wiki to go to that list, and then click on that link to get to the license agreement to see what exactly they're even agreeing to before they buy it. Is that allowed? If so, where the hell do you even find the license agreements for such products? Fephisto (talk) 03:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC)