Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here

IFTTT

From Consumer Action Taskforce
Revision as of 17:51, 15 January 2025 by Dskrap19 (talk | contribs) (Added more context, citations, and sources.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

⚠️ Article status notice: This article needs additional work

This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.

This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Notice: This Article Requires Additional Verification[edit source]

This article has been flagged for verification concerns. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the Moderator Guidelines and Mission statement; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!

Why This Article Is In Question[edit source]

Articles in this wiki are required to:

  • Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
  • Avoid relying on anecdotal, unsourced, or suspicious citations that lack legitimacy.
  • Make sure that all claims are backed by reliable documentation or reporting from reputable sources.

Examples of issues that trigger this notice:

  • A topic that heavily relies on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources.
  • Unsupported claims with no evidence or citations to back them up.
  • Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.

How You Can Improve This Article[edit source]

To address verification concerns:

  • Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
  • Make sure that claims are backed by reputable reporting or independent documentation.
  • Provide additional evidence to demonstrate systemic relevance and factual accuracy. For example:
    • Avoid: Claims based entirely on personal anecdotes or hearsay without supporting documentation.
    • Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.

If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join here.


IFTTT rolled back on a subscription plan that they previously advertised as being a "lifetime" subscription plan.


IFTTT stated on their website, "if you upgrade to Pro before October 31st, whatever price you choose will be what you pay per month forever."

https://web.archive.org/web/20201025203841/https://ifttt.com/explore/set_your_price_extended


The set your price monthly subscription was "($1.99 USD or more)."

Their website also stated, "set your price for Pro and we will honor it as long as your plan is active."

https://web.archive.org/web/20201030004652/https://ifttt.com/subscriptions/pro


After about three years, IFTTT rolled back on that "lifetime" subscription plan and increased the price depending on how much you were paying.

The way they did this was by dropping the subscription plan they had since deemed "Legacy Pro" altogether, and forced everybody on the legacy plan to a different "Pro+" plan, along with an increased monthly price.

Email users received regarding the plan change and price increase.









"On an upcoming renewal, legacy accounts will be migrated from our Legacy Pro tier to Pro+."

https://help.ifttt.com/hc/en-us/articles/16014462721435-Important-Update-to-the-Legacy-Pro-Plan