Forced software agreement on new HP PC

Revision as of 12:40, 22 February 2025 by InTransparencyWeTrust (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete

This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.

This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Learn more ▼

Short summary of the incident. Usually 2-3 sentences that summarize the contents or the article.

I am not sure if this should be under McAfee or Hewlett Packard (HP) but since the most egregious portion is from McAfee I am starting this about them. This also might need to be moved as it is not strictly about McAfee as a company and rather a complaint. If it needs moved I apologize and understand. However I am sure that there are many many more stories about McAfee participating in anti-consumer actions and shady business practices and this could be the start.

Background edit

A friend of mine recently purchased an HP desktop from Costco, and I was helping set it up when I encountered an unexpected hurdle. Upon first boot, I was presented with a mandatory terms and conditions page created by HP. This page required acceptance of two agreements: one for HP, which was expected, and another for McAfee. What felt off about this terms of service agreement was the placement of the McAfee terms—they were about one-third of the way down the scrollable document, tucked beneath a lengthy sliding-bar section dedicated to HP’s terms, making them easy to overlook and hard to find.

There was no option to bypass this agreement without accepting both sets of terms, nor was there an option to accept them later. I think that this is on all new HP PCs. It is also in the tutorial levels of a new PC owners experience so most are not looking for it there. While many users plan to reinstall Windows on a new machine, I had only intended to do a quick wipe rather than a full reinstallation. Unfortunately, the only way to bypass the forced acceptance was to perform a complete Windows reinstall.

Complicating matters further, the system's drivers did not function correctly post-reinstallation. It remains unclear whether this was due to an issue with HP, my old installation media, or Windows itself. After additional troubleshooting, the machine was successfully restored and is now functioning properly. However, the experience required significantly more time and effort than I had initially anticipated.

I did not take screen grabs since this was a new install and while I should have take a phone photo I did not think to do it. I also did not take the time to read all of the terms of service for both companies, and I am unsure if there is a way to copy them here.

[Incident] edit

Change title to be descriptive of the incident. Impartial and complete description of the events, including actions taken by the company, and the timeline of the incident coming to the public's attention.

[Company]'s response edit

If applicable add the proposed solution to the issues by the company.

Lawsuit edit

If applicable add any information regarding litigation around the incident here.

Claims edit

Main claims of the suit.

Rebuttal edit

The response of the company or counterclaims.

Outcome edit

The outcome, if any, of the suit.

Consumer response edit

Summary and key issues of prevailing sentiment from the consumers and commentators that can be documented via articles, emails to support, reviews and forum posts.

References edit