Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here
Eugene the contractor fkd me over
⚠️ Article status notice: This Article's Relevance Is Under Review
This article has been flagged for questionable relevance. Its connection to the systemic consumer protection issues outlined in the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines isn't clear.
Notice: This Article's Relevance Is Under Review
This article has been flagged for questionable relevance. Its connection to the systemic consumer protection issues outlined in the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines isn't clear. Articles that focus on isolated incidents, personal disputes, or local matters may not meet the inclusion criteria for the Consumer Action Taskforce Wiki.
Why This Article Is In Question
Articles in this wiki have to meet the following criteria:
- Systemic Nature: Demonstrate a broader pattern of systemic abuse, negligence, or policies that align with modern consumer exploitation (e.g., ownership revocation, barriers to repair, privacy violations, changing the terms of the sale after the sale).
- Relevance: Relate to consumer protection issues that extend beyond individual grievances or localized problems.
- Evidence: Provide verifiable evidence or credible sources to support the author's claims and demonstrate systemic impact.
Examples of articles that do not meet these criteria:
- A single negative customer experience; with no evidence of systemic issues or company policies enabling such behavior.
- Localized disputes, such as a bad experience with a contractor or small business, better suited for platforms like Yelp or local consumer protection agencies.
- Complaints that focus on personal dissatisfaction (e.g., "I waited too long for a response") without tying the issue to broader consumer exploitation themes.
How You Can Improve This Article
To justify the relevance of this article:
- Provide evidence demonstrating how the issue reflects broader consumer exploitation (e.g., systemic patterns, recurring incidents, or related company policies).
- Link the problem to modern forms of consumer protection concerns, such as privacy violations, barriers to repair, or ownership rights.
- Add credible sources or documentation that substantiate claims and connect them to systemic practices. i.e:
- A company that takes 5 days too long to refund a deposit is a bad Yelp review. Not eligible for inclusion.
- A company with 500,000 active repairs at any given time that purposely delays all deposit refunds for a period of five days, in order to invest/gamble with these deposits on their balance sheet, with verifiable hard proof from internal communications that this was an intentional & standard practice performed with malicious intent is eligible for inclusion.
If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once you have made the required improvements, please visit the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join Here.
End of Stub Notice. The article content begins below this line.
⚠️ Article status notice: This article needs additional work
This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.
This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the #appeals channel.
Notice: This Article Requires Additional Verification
This article has been flagged for verification concerns. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the Moderator Guidelines and Mission statement; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!
Why This Article Is In Question
Articles in this wiki are required to:
- Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
- Avoid relying on anecdotal, unsourced, or suspicious citations that lack legitimacy.
- Make sure that all claims are backed by reliable documentation or reporting from reputable sources.
Examples of issues that trigger this notice:
- A topic that heavily relies on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources.
- Unsupported claims with no evidence or citations to back them up.
- Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.
How You Can Improve This Article
To address verification concerns:
- Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
- Make sure that claims are backed by reputable reporting or independent documentation.
- Provide additional evidence to demonstrate systemic relevance and factual accuracy. For example:
- Avoid: Claims based entirely on personal anecdotes or hearsay without supporting documentation.
- Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.
If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join here.
⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked for deletion.
This article has been flagged for deletion because it is entirely outside the scope of this wiki. Content of this nature is not suitable for inclusion and does not align with the Mission statement or the Moderator Guidelines of the Consumer Action Taskforce Wiki.
No further edits should be made to this article.
Notice: This Article Does Not Belong Here
This article has been flagged for deletion because it is entirely outside the scope of this wiki. Content of this nature is not suitable for inclusion and does not align with the Mission statement or the Moderator Guidelines of the Consumer Action Taskforce Wiki.
Why This Article Does Not Belong
This wiki exists to provide meaningful and actionable insights about systemic consumer protection issues. Articles are expected to:
- Address topics that are directly relevant to modern consumer advocacy or systemic exploitation.
- Provide evidence or credible sources to support claims.
- Be written in a manner that aligns with the educational and professional tone of this platform.
The article in question:
- Contains content that is entirely irrelevant, such as personal grievances, bad Yelp-style reviews, or unrelated material.
- Shows no effort to engage with the systemic issues this wiki addresses.
- Fails to meet even the most basic criteria for inclusion as outlined in the Moderator Guidelines.
Next Steps
To maintain the quality and focus of this wiki, the article will be removed. If you believe this notice has been placed in error, please appeal via the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join Here.
Reminder
This platform is not a place for personal complaints or unrelated discussions. For guidance on contributing appropriate content, refer to:
End of Notice. No further edits should be made to this article.
eugene is a bad contractor he used OSB instead of plywood and made a squeaky floor and ran off with the money and when I did a deep dive on him it looks like his house burned down suspiciously close in time to the IRS placing a lien on him and asking for money , DON'T USE EUGENE!!!
