Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here

Canon Ink DRM

From Consumer Action Taskforce
Revision as of 14:06, 16 January 2025 by Eggs (talk | contribs) (corrected some wording and shortened quote as it was repeated earlier in the article)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Overview[edit | edit source]

DRM (Digital Rights Management) is a practice used by many major printer manufacturers including HP[1], Dymo[2], Lexmark[3] and Canon. The manufacturers include silicon chips as part of the ink cartridges that can identify a cartridge as coming directly from the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) as opposed to an aftermarket (often cheaper) alternative. When aftermarket cartridges are inserted, some printers will display a message suggesting the supposed dangers of using non-genuine ink and have in the past disabled device functionality when aftermarket ink is installed.[4]

Incident[edit | edit source]

During the global chip shortage from 2020-2023, Canon faced difficulty obtaining chips used in their printer ink cartridges. This resulted in genuine Canon ink cartridges behaving as if they were aftermarket cartridges when inserted to some Canon printers. A support page[5] on the Canon website was created instructing customers to ignore the warning/error messages that appeared as a result, stating this would cause "no negative effects on print quality".

Aftermath[edit | edit source]

The publishing of support material directly from Canon instructing customers to ignore the warning against aftermarket print cartridges drew attention on social media and from tech news outlets who considered the practice one that "consumers have long condemned as being anti-competitive"[6] with Vice stating: "as consumers and digital rights activists have been pointing out for ages, Canon essentially admits that its own DRM is absolutely not necessary”[7].

References[edit | edit source]