Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here

Talk:Retroactively amended purchase

From Consumer Action Taskforce
Revision as of 00:22, 16 January 2025 by Mingyee (talk | contribs) (Mingyee moved page Talk:Retroactively amended experiences to Talk:Retroactively amended purchase: This was originally “retroactive amended purchase experience”. It was renamed to avoid an appearance of impropriety and juvenility. The new article title, however, does not accurately reflect the content. It is not an experience that has been amended, but the purchase (whose amendment the consumer experiences this).)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies. (ok - have been informed that this is one that Louis has used. In that case, it's still not appropriate for an article title, but a section within the article can describe it as a popular coloquial term, and highlight why the comparison is made, and reference https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=R(etroactively)+A(mended)+P(urchase)+E(xperience)

Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump. -Keith

Retrieved from "https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/index.php?title=Talk:Retroactively_amended_purchase&oldid=1104"