Valve removes arbitration requirement from Steam Subscriber Agreement

Revision as of 14:48, 22 February 2025 by InTransparencyWeTrust (talk | contribs) (use references section)

In September 2024, Valve removed both the individual binding arbitration requirements and class-action waiver from the Steam Subscriber Agreement.[1][2][3] That agreement is essentially Steam's End-user license agreement. This was done because of a pending class-action lawsuit wherein "the named Plaintiffs won binding decisions from arbitrators rendering Valve's arbitration provision unenforceable for both lack of notice and because it impermissibly seeks to bar public injunctive relief."[4][5]

Implications

This restores consumer rights to both court litigation and class-action lawsuits, rather than being bound to forced arbitration, for resolving disputes with Steam.

References

  1. NACA's arbitration definition: https://www.consumeradvocates.org/for-consumers/arbitration/. . Archived from the original on 1 January, 2025. Retrieved 17 January, 2025.
  2. https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/593110/view/4696781406111167991. Archived from the original on 27 September, 2024. Retrieved 17 January, 2025.
  3. Steam Subscriber Agreement: https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement. Archived from the original on 28 September, 2024. Retrieved 17 January, 2025.
  4. "Steam doesn’t want to pay arbitration fees, tells gamers to sue instead": https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/09/steam-doesnt-want-to-pay-arbitration-fees-tells-gamers-to-sue-instead/. Archived from the original on 17 December, 2024. Retrieved 17 January, 2025.
  5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1f81qXxggo8, Louis Rossmann