Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here

Talk:Generative AI

From Consumer Action Taskforce
Revision as of 12:14, 18 January 2025 by Keith (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Relevancy concerns == Hi, thank you for contributing! I like the idea for having a theme article, or general category, surrounding issues relating to Gen AI, and I think this is a great start! I just wanted to give you a heads up though - There have been many situations where a company has treated its consumers unethically with, or in relation to, GenAI. Whether its through forcing them to give up their data, or through forcing poor implementations of GenAI onto th...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Relevancy concerns

Hi, thank you for contributing! I like the idea for having a theme article, or general category, surrounding issues relating to Gen AI, and I think this is a great start!

I just wanted to give you a heads up though - There have been many situations where a company has treated its consumers unethically with, or in relation to, GenAI. Whether its through forcing them to give up their data, or through forcing poor implementations of GenAI onto the consumer and removing better alternatives. We need to be careful though - worker replacement, and the ethical issues surrounding collection of training data from the open web, are a bit beyond the scope of the wiki, which we want to keep squarely focused on consumer issues, rather than general corporate maleficence or controversies.

For example, the currently listed DeviantArt incident makes sense to include, but I think the Stability AI incident is probably beyond the scope of the Wiki. Keith (talk) 12:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)