Jump to content

User talk:Tob: Difference between revisions

From Consumer_Action_Taskforce
Latest comment: 24 January by Martinligabue in topic tl:ProductPage
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
Hey [[User:Tob|@Username]], I left a reply and made some change/suggestions on your format [[Consumer Protection Format (Unofficial)|here]].  
Hey [[User:Tob|@Username]], I left a reply and made some change/suggestions on your format [[Consumer Protection Format (Unofficial)|here]].  
[[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 00:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
[[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 00:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
==tl:ProductPage==
I'm not sure why that template is using a parameter for the key, and one for the value... Wouldn't it be much more easier to have a parameter that's the key, directly connected to the value?
Instead of
<code>|infobox_1_key=Release Year</code>
<code>|infobox_1_value=2003</code>
it would be
<code>|release_year=2003</code>
--[[User:Martinligabue|Martinligabue]] ([[User talk:Martinligabue|talk]]) 12:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:52, 24 January 2025

heroic user


Hey, in regards to the categories, while I agree that product might sound better, since we started organizing with the Product Line category please keep it in the article for now. This might change in the future but it helps moderate right now. Also, if you want to track the pages you create you can go to Special:Contributions/Tob and filter by page creation for examlple. I understand that the naming is not consistent right now but while we are figuring things out it helps to have a standard category at least (however bad it may sound) Kostas

   Sounds good to me. My intention wasn't to remove the other categories, only to include the originals. I should have noted that. Additionally, if the common consensus is to use pluralized category names I'm also cool with that. Tob (talk)

All good, I should have checked the revision history rather than just the message. Honestly I made the pluralized name and I kind of regret it now but I was in a rush to have at least something to categorize by. Whenever it is apparent which one people prefer or if another scheme is decided upon I expect we will set up redirects. Kostas


RE: customer protection format

Hey @Username, I left a reply and made some change/suggestions on your format here. Kostas (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

tl:ProductPage

I'm not sure why that template is using a parameter for the key, and one for the value... Wouldn't it be much more easier to have a parameter that's the key, directly connected to the value?

Instead of

|infobox_1_key=Release Year

|infobox_1_value=2003

it would be

|release_year=2003

--Martinligabue (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply