Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here
User talk:Waldo: Difference between revisions
From Consumer Action Taskforce
Jump to navigationJump to search
talk |
Reply to Kostas |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hey, thanks for taking on the categorization before it becomes more unmanagable. I have changed the category link to point to the root category you created. An issue that may come up is when we started we were using Product Line to categorize products as that was the language used in the tiers in [[Article Types]]. Once we reach a consencus on which to use we might have to migrate the Products Category you created. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 13:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | Hey, thanks for taking on the categorization before it becomes more unmanagable. I have changed the category link to point to the root category you created. An issue that may come up is when we started we were using Product Line to categorize products as that was the language used in the tiers in [[Article Types]]. Once we reach a consencus on which to use we might have to migrate the Products Category you created. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 13:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
: Sure, thanks for updating the link. I moved a few pages to [[:Category:Products|Products]] myself, so if the decision has been made to move everything to [[:Category:Product Line|Product Line]], shoot me a message and I'll take care of it. It would be nice not to have to complete a captcha every time, though (wink, wink) :). | |||
: On a related note, I wasn't certain whether category names should be plural or not, so a concensus needs to be reached there. [[:Category:Companies|Companies]] had more pages than [[:Category:Company|Company]] and [[:Category:Products|Products]] had more than [[:Category:Product|Product]], so that's where I categorized things for now. I'm mentioning this now because you may want to go for [[:Category:Product Lines|Product Lines]] instead of [[:Category:Product Line|Product Line]]. | |||
: There's also the topic of capitalization. Again, sentence case ([[:Category:Right to repair|Right to repair]]) was more popular than title case ([[:Category:Right to Repair|Right to Repair]]), so that's where I put things. Case is also a consideration in the case of [[:Category:Product Line|Product Line]]. [[User:Waldo|Waldo]] ([[User talk:Waldo|talk]]) 13:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:17, 18 January 2025
Hey, thanks for taking on the categorization before it becomes more unmanagable. I have changed the category link to point to the root category you created. An issue that may come up is when we started we were using Product Line to categorize products as that was the language used in the tiers in Article Types. Once we reach a consencus on which to use we might have to migrate the Products Category you created. Kostas (talk) 13:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, thanks for updating the link. I moved a few pages to Products myself, so if the decision has been made to move everything to Product Line, shoot me a message and I'll take care of it. It would be nice not to have to complete a captcha every time, though (wink, wink) :).
- On a related note, I wasn't certain whether category names should be plural or not, so a concensus needs to be reached there. Companies had more pages than Company and Products had more than Product, so that's where I categorized things for now. I'm mentioning this now because you may want to go for Product Lines instead of Product Line.
- There's also the topic of capitalization. Again, sentence case (Right to repair) was more popular than title case (Right to Repair), so that's where I put things. Case is also a consideration in the case of Product Line. Waldo (talk) 13:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
