Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here
Talk:Positive Practices: Difference between revisions
From Consumer Action Taskforce
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Have marked this as irrelevant, because unfortunately this is a topic which seems too wide-ranging and vague for the wiki, as well as exceptionally prone to brigading by those wishing to promote their own products. There are too many good products in the world to list them all in one page. The Q&A in the [[Mission statement]] describes the only scenario in which we imagine products being mentioned as 'alternatives' | Have marked this as irrelevant, because unfortunately this is a topic which seems too wide-ranging and vague for the wiki, as well as exceptionally prone to brigading by those wishing to promote their own products. There are too many good products in the world to list them all in one page. The Q&A in the [[Mission statement]] describes the only scenario in which we imagine products being mentioned as 'alternatives' in a positive light. | ||
Depending on further discussion, it will probably be deleted. | Depending on further discussion, it will probably be deleted. | ||
- Keith | - Keith | ||
Revision as of 15:01, 17 January 2025
Have marked this as irrelevant, because unfortunately this is a topic which seems too wide-ranging and vague for the wiki, as well as exceptionally prone to brigading by those wishing to promote their own products. There are too many good products in the world to list them all in one page. The Q&A in the Mission statement describes the only scenario in which we imagine products being mentioned as 'alternatives' in a positive light.
Depending on further discussion, it will probably be deleted.
- Keith
