Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here
Talk:Retroactively amended purchase: Difference between revisions
From Consumer Action Taskforce
Jump to navigationJump to search
MoveLateral (talk | contribs) m MoveLateral moved page Talk:Retroactively Amended Purchase Experience to Talk:Retroactively amended experiences without leaving a redirect: A name change because no, we cannot have articles with titles that spell out "RAPE". |
m Mingyee moved page Talk:Retroactively amended experiences to Talk:Retroactively amended purchase: This was originally “retroactive amended purchase experience”. It was renamed to avoid an appearance of impropriety and juvenility. The new article title, however, does not accurately reflect the content. It is not an experience that has been amended, but the purchase (whose amendment the consumer experiences this). |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 00:22, 16 January 2025
I suggest a move and title change for this page - let's move away from the edgy analogies. (ok - have been informed that this is one that Louis has used. In that case, it's still not appropriate for an article title, but a section within the article can describe it as a popular coloquial term, and highlight why the comparison is made, and reference https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=R(etroactively)+A(mended)+P(urchase)+E(xperience)
Also, this comes across as a bit of a chatgpt dump. -Keith
