Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here
Talk:Mission statement: Difference between revisions
From Consumer Action Taskforce
Jump to navigationJump to search
EchoKnight (talk | contribs) m adjusted layout and formatting to better fit a proper MediaWiki talk page, including adding user's signature and creating a heading with a suitable title |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The mission statement itself is a bit scaring. It's the first page to see and could turn away people that try to look up something in the future. This article has to move at some point to a more inviting page, maybe not in the next time tho. [[User:Tpat90|Tpat90]] ([[User talk:Tpat90|talk]]) 22:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | The mission statement itself is a bit scaring. It's the first page to see and could turn away people that try to look up something in the future. This article has to move at some point to a more inviting page, maybe not in the next time tho. [[User:Tpat90|Tpat90]] ([[User talk:Tpat90|talk]]) 22:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
Agree, but until we are aiming to attract readers rather than contributors, I'm happy for us to keep it as is. It'll likely be a while before the wiki is useful to a casual reader [[User:Keith|Keith]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 15 January 2025
Concern about mission statement[edit source]
The mission statement itself is a bit scaring. It's the first page to see and could turn away people that try to look up something in the future. This article has to move at some point to a more inviting page, maybe not in the next time tho. Tpat90 (talk) 22:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Agree, but until we are aiming to attract readers rather than contributors, I'm happy for us to keep it as is. It'll likely be a while before the wiki is useful to a casual reader Keith
