Consumer Action Taskforce talk:Moderator guidelines: Difference between revisions
DavidBenJr (talk | contribs) Small typo |
m Keith moved page Consumer Action Taskforce talk:Moderator Guidelines to Consumer Action Taskforce talk:Moderator guidelines: Misspelled title: Not in sentence case |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just a few typos | == Just a few typos == | ||
#* Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable <-notable | #* Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable <-notable | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised? | A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised? | ||
-- Preceding unsigned comment by DavidBenJr at 04:21, 15 January 2025 | |||
The spelling of “authorization” and the like depend on regional standards. Americans tend to spell it with a z, and the z spelling is actually also preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary. This is in contrast to analyze/analyse, where the OED prefers the s spelling. There is some etymological reason that I cannot be bothered to remember. [[User:Mingyee|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee|talk]]) 11:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | |||