Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here

Talk:Microsoft: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Action Taskforce
Jump to navigationJump to search
JamesTDG (talk | contribs)
Created page with "I cannot deny, the "dark patterns" section definitely feels a bit inflammatory, though I'm curious to know if other seconds are a bit inflammatory ~~~~"
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I cannot deny, the "dark patterns" section definitely feels a bit inflammatory, though I'm curious to know if other seconds are a bit inflammatory [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 15:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
I cannot deny, the "dark patterns" section definitely feels a bit inflammatory, though I'm curious to know if other seconds are a bit inflammatory [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 15:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
: Agree, I added the ToneWarning because the whole page seemed 'off' -Keith
: Any ideas on how to tone the rest of the page down? I know we'd need to get the attention of the "dark patterns" author to know the intent before we clean that section up. [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
== Dark patterns section ==
Is it even worth keeping tbh, I was looking for sources and its a barely talked about topic, could just be worth scrapping altogether even after I fixed some of the language.

Latest revision as of 04:06, 18 January 2025

I cannot deny, the "dark patterns" section definitely feels a bit inflammatory, though I'm curious to know if other seconds are a bit inflammatory JamesTDG (talk) 15:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Agree, I added the ToneWarning because the whole page seemed 'off' -Keith
Any ideas on how to tone the rest of the page down? I know we'd need to get the attention of the "dark patterns" author to know the intent before we clean that section up. JamesTDG (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Dark patterns section[edit source]

Is it even worth keeping tbh, I was looking for sources and its a barely talked about topic, could just be worth scrapping altogether even after I fixed some of the language.