Please note that all submissions to the site are subject to the wiki's licence, CC 4.0 BY-SA, as found here

Template:Incomplete: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Action Taskforce
Jump to navigationJump to search
m tags
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>
== Usage ==
Simply add <pre><nowiki>{{Incomplete}}</nowiki></pre> in the begginning of the article to add this notice:
[[Category:Template Article Notice]]
</noinclude>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Uses style code from https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Colored_box -->
<!-- Uses style code from https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Colored_box -->
<div class="cat-mw-box" style="border-radius:0.2rem;border:1px solid #a2a9b1;margin-bottom:2rem">
<div class="cat-mw-box" style="border-radius:0.2rem;border:1px solid #a2a9b1;margin-bottom:2rem">
Line 9: Line 18:
''This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the <code>#appeals</code> channel.''
''This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the <code>#appeals</code> channel.''


= Notice: This Article Requires Additional Verification =
<div style="font-size:1.75em; font-weight: 500;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em"> Notice: This Article Requires Additional Verification </div>
 
----
This article has been flagged due to'''verification concerns'''. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the [[Moderator Guidelines]] and [[Mission statement]]; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!
This article has been flagged due to '''verification concerns'''. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the [[Moderator Guidelines]] and [[Mission statement]]; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!


== Why This Article Is In Question ==
<div style="font-size:1.5em; font-weight: 450;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em"> Why This Article Is In Question </div>
----
Articles in this wiki are required to:
Articles in this wiki are required to:
* Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
* Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
Line 24: Line 34:
* Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.
* Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.


== How You Can Improve This Article ==
<div style="font-size:1.5em; font-weight: 450;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em"> How You Can Improve This Article </div>
----
To address verification concerns:
To address verification concerns:
* Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
* Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
Line 32: Line 43:
** Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.
** Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.


If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the <code>#appeals</code> channel on our Discord server: [https://discord.gg/WUW6GGDMvW Join here.]
If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the <code>#appeals</code> channel on our Discord server: [https://discord.gg/8w5rSNAXRf Join here.]


[[Category:Articles in need of additional work]]
<includeonly>[[Category:Articles in need of additional work]]</includeonly>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 11:15, 17 January 2025

Usage

Simply add

{{Incomplete}}

in the begginning of the article to add this notice:


⚠️ Article status notice: This article needs additional work

This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.

This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Notice: This Article Requires Additional Verification

This article has been flagged due to verification concerns. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the Moderator Guidelines and Mission statement; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!

Why This Article Is In Question

Articles in this wiki are required to:

  • Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
  • Avoid relying on anecdotal, unsourced, or suspicious citations that lack legitimacy.
  • Make sure that all claims are backed by reliable documentation or reporting from reputable sources.

Examples of issues that trigger this notice:

  • A topic that heavily relies on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources.
  • Unsupported claims with no evidence or citations to back them up.
  • Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.
How You Can Improve This Article

To address verification concerns:

  • Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
  • Make sure that claims are backed by reputable reporting or independent documentation.
  • Provide additional evidence to demonstrate systemic relevance and factual accuracy. For example:
    • Avoid: Claims based entirely on personal anecdotes or hearsay without supporting documentation.
    • Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.

If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join here.