Editing Microsoft

{{incomplete}}
{{ToneWarning}}
----

Microsoft had stated that Windows 10 would be the last Windows version, but now they are forcing users into Windows 11 by discontinuing free official support for Windows 10 starting on October 14, 2025<ref>https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/end-of-support</ref> . Windows 11 also new requirements for the installation, including a Microsoft account<!-- As this can be fairly easily bypassed, i'm not sure describing a microsoft account as a requirement is an appropriate word use? -->, TPM (trusted platform module).<ref>https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-10-specifications</ref><ref>https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-11-system-requirements-86c11283-ea52-4782-9efd-7674389a7ba3</ref> Many PCs made before X year do not have this hardware. It is notable that most of these restrictions can be bypassed. New Windows 11 builds are now shipping with Microsoft Copilot which is a pre-installed opt-out AI program.<ref>https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-11</ref><!-- Unsure how appropriate this is for a company page... seems more like an incident. A page about microsoft should really just focus on an overview, and linking to relevant Incident pages, and the other high-level things discussed on the article types page. -->

== Controversies ==

=== Court cases up to the early 2000s ===
In the major antitrust case brought by the US Department of Justice, U.S. v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001)<ref>https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/253/34/576095/</ref>, Microsoft argued that there was no barrier to entry in the market they were in. A central issue at that time was whether Microsoft could bundle the web browser Internet Explorer with the Microsoft Windows operating system. The following was said <!-- By whom? -->in the court case: "The District Court condemned a number of provisions in Microsoft's agreements licensing Windows to OEMs, because it found that Microsoft's imposition of those provisions (like many of Microsoft's other actions at issue in this case) serves to reduce usage share of Netscape's browser and, hence, protect Microsoft's operating system monopoly."

The court specifically identified three main license restrictions for Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) that were considered problematic:

# the prohibition upon the removal of desktop icons, folders, and Start menu entries
# the prohibition for modifying the initial boot sequence
# the prohibition of otherwise altering the appearance of the Windows desktop

The case was eventually settled<ref>https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/file/503541/dl</ref><ref>https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/373/1199/474311/</ref>, and did not result in a company breakup<ref>https://www.seattletimes.com/business/microsoft/long-antitrust-saga-ends-for-microsoft/</ref>.

Section III.H of the Consent Decree<ref>https://www.justice.gov/atr/microsoft-consent-decree-compliance-advisory-august-1-2003-us-v-microsoft</ref> required Microsoft to "allow end users and OEMs to enable or remove access to all middleware products, including web browsers, e-mail clients, and media players through a readily accessible, centralized mechanism". End users and OEMs should be able "to specify a non-Microsoft middleware product as the default middleware product to be launched in place of the corresponding Microsoft middleware product". 

In the case United States v. Microsoft Corp., 87 F. Supp. 2d 30 (D.D.C. 2000)<ref>https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/87/30/2307082/</ref>, Microsoft's Conduct taken as a whole is described as "deliberate assault upon entrepreneurial efforts that, could well have enabled the introduction of competition into the market for Intel-compatible PC operating systems". Further, "Microsoft's anticompetitive actions trammeled the competitive process through which the computer software industry generally stimulates innovation and conduces to the optimum benefit of consumers".

=== Edge<!-- tone is way off here -->===
Microsoft's web browser, Edge, has also been a major problem for consumers. Windows comes with it preinstalled, and while it is possible to remove, Microsoft makes it harder and harder with each update. They state the reason for this as follows: "Our default web browser is an essential component of our operating system and can’t be uninstalled."<ref>https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/why-can-t-i-uninstall-microsoft-edge-ee150b3b-7d7a-9984-6d83-eb36683d526d</ref>

=== Windows 11 ===

==== TPM 2.0 Chip Requirements ====
While being something that can be reasonably circumvented<ref>https://www.starwindsoftware.com/blog/bypass-tpm-and-install-windows-11-on-unsupported-hardware/</ref>, Microsoft's decision to attempt to lock-down Windows 11 to computers with Trusted Platform Module 2.0 chips (TPMs) has forced the hands of both consumers and companies alike to dispose of hardware that would otherwise be perfectly acceptable to use<ref>https://securityonline.info/windows-11s-tpm-2-0-free-software-foundation-fights-forced-upgrades-and-e-waste/</ref>. This has also included Windows 10 users to be frequently reminded by Microsoft to upgrade their hardware to Windows 11<ref>https://www.pcmag.com/news/microsoft-revives-pop-ups-in-windows-10-to-push-windows-11-upgrades</ref><ref>https://www.techradar.com/computing/windows/microsoft-embarrasses-itself-with-windows-10-pop-up-that-hogs-the-desktop-urging-an-upgrade-to-windows-11-then-promptly-crashes</ref>, which has caused many users frequent agitation<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/microsoft/comments/19dvs9k/any_way_to_disable_the_upgrade_to_windows_11_ads/</ref>.

==== Recall ====
During 2024, Microsoft unveiled Recall<ref name=":0">https://www.techradar.com/computing/windows/microsoft-reveals-ai-powered-recall-feature-to-transform-windows-11s-searchability-while-confirming-hardware-requirements</ref>, marketed as a way to search through what you have done on your computer. This sparked controversy<ref>https://www.techradar.com/computing/windows/microsofts-controversial-recall-feature-for-windows-11-could-already-be-in-legal-hot-water</ref>, especially among security experts<ref>https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/feature/Privacy-and-security-risks-surrounding-Microsoft-Recall</ref> who worried about the security of screenshots<ref>https://news.sky.com/story/microsoft-ai-feature-investigated-by-uk-watchdog-over-screenshots-13141171</ref>, since it could easily document private information like Social Security Numbers, bank account information, and passwords, as well as user browsing behavior. There is also a python script called "TotalRecall"<ref>https://github.com/xaitax/TotalRecall</ref> that collects the screenshots and descriptions of them proving the danger of Recall<ref name=":0" />. This feature was delayed after backlash<ref>https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2024/06/microsoft-recall-delayed-after-privacy-and-security-concerns</ref>.

=== Microsoft account dark patterns when installing Windows<!-- Tone, and needs sources -->===
Numerous dark patterns have been implemented in the form of sneaky language and user interface during the installation process to mislead users into thinking a Microsoft account is required and thus logging in or creating an account. The dark patterns to push users towards linking a Microsoft account have been in place since Windows 10 was launched in 2015 and continue into the Windows 11 installation process.
=== De-listing/destruction of access to games ===
In early September of 2016, Microsoft shut down access to purchasing Xbox 360 Indie Games <ref>https://www.polygon.com/2015/9/9/9297959/xbox-live-indie-games-shutting-down</ref>, and in late July of 2024, Microsoft shut down their storefront for Xbox 360 games<ref>https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2023/08/17/xbox-360-store-will-close-july-2024/</ref>. These shutdowns have caused hundreds of games to become impossible to obtain new copies of and for some, additionally play.

== References ==
<references />
[[Category:Companies]]